Posts Tagged learning design
New paper out in the Journal of Learning Analytics Research, building on our previous papers dealing with how learners engage with MOOCs.
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are being used across the world to provide millions of learners with access to education. Many who begin these courses complete them successfully, or to their own satisfaction, but the high numbers who do not finish remain a subject of concern. In 2013, a team from Stanford University analysed engagement patterns on three MOOCs run on the Coursera platform. They found four distinct patterns of engagement that emerged from MOOCs based on videos and assessments. Subsequent studies on the FutureLearn platform, which is underpinned by social-constructivist pedagogy, indicate that patterns of engagement in these massive learning environments are influenced by decisions about pedagogy and learning design. This paper reports on two of these studies of learner engagement with FutureLearn courses. Study One first tries, not wholly successfully, to replicate the findings of the Coursera study in a new context. It then uses the same methodological approach to identify patterns of learner engagement on the FutureLearn platform, and indicates how these patterns are influenced by pedagogy and elements of learning design. Study Two investigates whether these patterns of engagement are stable on subsequent presentations of the same courses. Two patterns are found consistently in this and other work: samplers who visit briefly, and completers who fully engage with the course. The paper concludes by exploring the implications for both research and practice.
Ferguson, Rebecca, & Clow, Doug. (2016). Consistent commitment: patterns of engagement across time in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(3), 63-88.
On 28 October I ran a pre-conference workshop at the 14th European Conference on e-Learning (held at the University of Hertfordshire) on ‘Learning design and learning analytics: building the links with MOOCs’.
To give a focus to the workshop, I aimed to choose a FutureLearn MOOC on a subject that everyone would know a little about and no one would know a lot about. As it was three days after the 600th anniversary of Agincourt (a famous battle in English history that fans of Shakespeare may know of through his play, Henry V) I picked the University of Southampton’s MOOC on the subject, ‘Agincourt 1415: Myth and Reality’.
I had reckoned without the international scope of the ECEL conference – I had picked on a subject that most of my audience knew nothing about, and that held little interest for them. Nevertheless, they bravely grappled with issues of learning design related to medieval muster rolls, ancient armour and the issue of whether war crimes existed before they were defined in law.
This hands-on workshop will work with learning design tools and with massive open online courses (MOOCs) on the FutureLearn platform to explore how learning design can be used to influence the choice and design of learning analytics. This workshop will be of interest to people who are involved in the design or presentation of online courses, and to those who want to find out more about learning design, learning analytics or MOOCs.
I just hit 10,000 views on a presentation I uploaded to Slideshare a couple of months ago.
I’m pleased, but puzzled. There’s no clear reason why ‘Learning design and learning analytics‘ should have proved to be so much more popular than my other Slideshares, which typically get 500-1500 views.
This special issue, edited by Yishay Mor, Barbara Wasson and myself, developed from an Alpine Rendezvous workshop we ran in 2013 that dealt with the connections between learning design, learning analytics and teacher inquiry.
This special issue deals with three areas. Learning design is the practice of devising effective learning experiences aimed at achieving defined educational objectives in a given context. Teacher inquiry is an approach to professional development and capacity building in education in which teachers study their own and their peers’ practice. Learning analytics use data about learners and their contexts to understand and optimise learning and the environments in which it takes place. Typically, these three—design, inquiry and analytics—are seen as separate areas of practice and research. In this issue, we show that the three can work together to form a virtuous circle. Within this circle, learning analytics offers a powerful set of tools for teacher inquiry, feeding back into improved learning design. Learning design provides a semantic structure for analytics, whereas teacher inquiry defines meaningful questions to analyse.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
VOL 46; NUMB 2 (2015)
Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action
Mor, Y.; Ferguson, R.; Wasson, B.
Informing learning design with learning analytics to improve teacher inquiry
Persico, D.; Pozzi, F.
A method for teacher inquiry in cross-curricular projects: Lessons from a case study
Avramides, K.; Hunter, J.; Oliver, M.; Luckin, R.
Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design
McKenney, S.; Mor, Y.
Forward-oriented designing for learning as a means to achieve educational quality
Ghislandi, P. M.; Raffaghelli, J. E.
Analysing content and patterns of interaction for improving the learning design of networked learning environments
Haya, P. A.; Daems, O.; Malzahn, N.; Castellanos, J.; Hoppe, H. U.
How was the activity? A visualization support for a case of location-based learning design
Melero, J.; Hernndez-Leo, D.; Sun, J.; Santos, P.; Blat, J.
Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations
Rodrguez-Triana, M. J.; Martnez-Mons, A.; Asensio-Prez, J. I.; Dimitriadis, Y.
Mor, Yishay, Ferguson, Rebecca, & Wasson, Barbara. (2015). Editorial: learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: a call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 221-229.
After presenting at the SoLAR Flare learning analytics event last month, I was invited to the London Knowledge Lab to present at one of their regular What The Research Says seminars. This month, the subject was on ‘Designing a MOOC’, and I talked about building the links between learning design and learning analytics. This included a look at patterns of engagement in MOOCs, and how they vary according to pedagogy and learning design.
Other speakers at the event:
- Diana Laurillard: Introduction to designing MOOCs: Theory, practice and evidence
- Russell Beale: Social Learning the FutureLearn way
- Matt Jenner: The research says very little: Designing a MOOC Platform
- Natasha Bonnelame: Tate / Khan Project: Learning in an Altermodern World
- Tim Powell-Jones: Encouraging learning through social dynamics in a MOOC
Special Issue of BJET
Teacher-led inquiry, learning design and learning analytics: a virtuous circle
Guest editors: Dr Yishay Mor, Dr Rebecca Ferguson and Professor Barbara Wasson
Deadline for submissions: 2 September 2013
This special issue on Teacher-led inquiry, learning design and learning analytics, BJET Volume 46, Issue 1, will be published in January 2015.
This issue seeks to explore the synergy between teacher-led inquiry into student learning (TISL), learning design, and learning analytics.
For learning design to be effective, it should be informed and evaluated by teacher inquiry or should form part of a process of inquiry. For TISL to be meaningful, it should support the design of activities and resources. Together, these suggest an integrated dynamic model of teaching as design inquiry of learning. The recent emergence of learning analytics as a field offers to equip learners and teachers with powerful new tools that can support their inquiry into learning practices